Time
The session is transcribed and the documentation comes out of it. Test scoring, case note and treatment plan arrive as drafts instead of being typed up in the evening.
Practice and clinic software for the Arabic-speaking region
Hauna brings practice management, assessment, therapy tools and AI-assisted documentation into one system — in Arabic, not in translation. The work that piles up after a session is produced during it.
Four points where a practice's day changes. Each one is a feature in the system — not a projection.
The session is transcribed and the documentation comes out of it. Test scoring, case note and treatment plan arrive as drafts instead of being typed up in the evening.
Whatever you no longer score or retype yourself remains as treatment time. Online booking and the waiting list fill open slots without anyone making a phone call.
Six structured group programmes and over 240 tools are already there — group and guided self-help formats can be offered without developing them first.
Service capture, billing and invoices in the same system as the record. No transfer between programmes, no second set of data.
We deliberately quote no percentage for time saved. We have not measured it, and an estimate would be a claim. What stands above describes what the software does — verifiable in a walkthrough against your own workflows.
Four building blocks, one body of data. What assessment produces lands in the record; what is said in session becomes the draft documentation — no retyping, no second programme.
Appointments, calendar, online booking, waiting list, day list, billing and invoices — alongside intake, course of treatment, findings and letters in one place.
Over 140 instruments, from PHQ-9 and GAD-7 to BDI-II, MADRS, PCL-5 and AUDIT. The patient completes them on their own device; scoring appears in the record immediately.
Over 240 exercises and worksheets, plus six structured group programmes for ADHD, anxiety, depression, couples, social skills and stress.
The video session is transcribed live; from it comes the draft of the case note and the treatment plan. Approval always stays with the clinician.
It is not the interface that was translated; the clinical content was maintained in Arabic. That is the difference you only notice in daily use.
8,568
Assessments, tools, programmes and treatment plans in Arabic — counted in the source, not estimated.
46
Crisis detection works by rule in Arabic and distinguishes levels: an explicit suicidal statement reaches the highest level, a neutral statement none.
45 s
Measured on our server: from an Arabic session transcript, the documentation draft takes 45 seconds — on ordinary CPU cores, without a graphics card.
RTL
Writing direction is part of the layout, not a switch. Arabic emergency numbers and regional contacts are configured per site.
What we have not measured is the word error rate of Arabic speech recognition. For German it is 2.6 per cent (our own measurement); for Arabic the evidence is outstanding, which is why no figure appears here.
Health data is a special category under Article 9 GDPR. The architecture treats it that way — not as a setting somebody can forget.
The language model runs on your machine. A guard in the code blocks cloud providers wherever patient data could appear in a prompt — it cannot be switched off by configuration.
Separation between organisations is enforced by the database (row level security), not merely by the application. A coding mistake therefore cannot expose another organisation's records.
Model, prompt version and timestamp are stored with the result. Without them, nobody could later say how a draft came about.
Clinical and administrative roles require two-factor sign-in. Particularly sensitive fields are encrypted at field level.
The security architecture is documented in 15 layers, from role checks and prompt-injection detection through to the nightly audit-log review. We provide the documentation on request.
The platform was built in Germany and designed for care across several language regions — that was a requirement, not an addition.
German, English, Arabic, Turkish, Russian and French — interface, assessments and therapy content.
Writing direction is part of the layout, not a switch bolted on afterwards. Arabic content is clinically maintained.
Crisis contacts are configured per location. Someone in Cairo shown a German number would reach nobody.
FHIR export and a connection to the German telematics infrastructure are in place. Billing catalogues come from official sources.
One piece of software instead of three: record, assessment and video consultation without switching programmes.
Several sites as separate tenants — shared administration, separated data.
Structured group programmes, a roles and approval model, and an audit trail for internal review.
This list is here because you would ask anyway — and because a vendor who hides it is being imprecise about everything else too.
There is no CE marking and no listing as a reimbursable digital health application. Classification under the EU Medical Device Regulation is open and being clarified.
There is no outcome data from routine care. Maturity is TRL 5–6: fully built, not yet clinically validated.
It produces drafts. Diagnosis, treatment decisions and approval rest with the clinician — enforced in the architecture, not merely agreed.
We show the system against your workflows, not a demo practice. Tell us what you use today and where it gets in the way.
Request a walkthroughnoha.eissa@haunacare.com